Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student of Philosophy, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Religions and Mysticism, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch

Abstract

The history of Chinese philosophy clearly shows that one of the most concerns for people of the region had been adaption of human with nature and society. In the field of art and painting, it can be concluded that for them, nature is very much the same as ink brush painting. Both nature and the paintings are a symbol of beauty and harmony of the cosmos. Thus, this paper is based on the teachings of the Dao, the ideological influence in shaping all aspects of ancient Chinese culture, especially in the field of visual culture; the meaning of "nature" in Chinese landscape through coordination with it is studied. Conception of nature is related to spontaneity or spontaneous recall things and gets rid of the artificial matter. So when things being free to follow their natural path, moving in perfect harmony. Generally, Dao is symphonic with the nature of the course and flow of nature. The way Dao is in the Chinese art throughout history, e.g. natural and spontaneous course of things, and purpose of the artist's inspiration, stems from the notion of hidden power that touches the soul and variety it describes the different types of viewers. The purpose monk Dao should avoid is anything that is inconsistent with the nature. It is not nature that needs to reform and perfect, but it is “we” who need to change and we must adapt ourselves to do it. It should not be against nature and the nature of the way that artists go through. Artist should disappear in nature. The Dao School, as the driving principle of the universe (Dao) is defined as harmony between opposites that interact with each other (Yin and Yang). Balance between opposites is a natural force or spirit, called "chi" creates. Hence, landscape paintings (shan-shui) are also a reflection of the prevailing belief in the “Yin” and “Yang”.
 

Keywords

ابوالقاسمی، محمدرضا‏(1391). «دائوئیسم و نقاشی منظرۀ چینی»، دوفصلنامۀ مطالعات تطبیقی هنر، سال دوم، شمارۀ سوم، بهار و تابستان.
بی‏پروا، محسن(1381). «تأثیر مفهوم تهی در تفکر دائو بر فضای خالی نقاشی چینی»، فصلنامۀ هنر، شمارۀ 54، زمستان.
بینیون، لورنس(1384‏). «کیفیت زیبایی در نقاشی ایران»، ترجمۀ نوشین نفیسی، در «از طبیعت و جلوۀ آن در نقاشی ایران و چین». مرتضی حیدری و...، کتاب ماه هنر،  شماره 83-84، مرداد و شهریور.
پاشایی ع، دائو‏(1377). راهی برای تفکر، برگردان و تحقیق: دائو د جینگ.  تهران: چشمه،.
جای چو، و چای وینبرگ‏(1369). «تاریخ فلسفه چین»، ترجمۀ ع . پاشایی، تهران: نشر گفتار، چاپ دوم.
راسخی، فروزان‏(1378). «ارتباط انسان و طبیعت در اسلام و آیین دائو»، فصلنامۀ هفت آسمان، شماره 20، تابستان.
ریخته‌گران، محمدرضا‏(1385‏). هنر و زیبایی‌شناسی در شرق آسیا، تهران: انتشارات فرهنگستان هنر.
لائو، دزو(1377)‏.  دائو دِ جینگ، ترجمۀ هرمز ریاحی و بهزاد برکت، تهران: فکر روز،.
کالتنمارک، ماکس(1369)‏. لائوتزه و آیین دائو، ترجمۀ شهرنوش پارسی‏پور، تهران: به‏نگار،.
کوماراسوامی، آناندا‏(1383)‏، «نظریۀ هنر در آسیا»، ترجمۀ صالح طباطبایی، فصلنامۀ خیال، شماره 9، بهار.
گامبریچ، ارنست (1386). تاریخ هنر، ترجمۀعلی رامین. تهران: نی.
Clunas Craig, 1997 Art in China, Oxford: Oxford University Press,.
Chang Chung-yuan, 1970. Creativity and Taoism, A Study of Chinese Philosophy, Art, and Poetry. New York,.
Chuang Tzu 1996, Fung Yu-lan's translation of the Tao Te Ching, chapter 80, in his A Taoist Classic: Chuang-Tzu, Columbia University Press.
Moeller, Hans-Georg2006. The Philosophy of the Daodejing. New York: Columbia University Press..
Smith Huston, 2007”Taoism” Features in:  Light from the East: Eastern Wisdom for the Modern West, World Wisdom, Inc. Edited by Harry Oldmeadow,.
Watson Burton 1964 (tr.), Chuang Tzu: The Basic Writings New York: Columbia University Press,.